<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>National Security &#8211; The American Mercury</title>
	<atom:link href="https://theamericanmercury.org/tag/national-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://theamericanmercury.org</link>
	<description>Founded by H.L. Mencken in 1924</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:07:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>2011: A Brave New Dystopia</title>
		<link>https://theamericanmercury.org/2011/01/2011-a-brave-new-dystopia/</link>
					<comments>https://theamericanmercury.org/2011/01/2011-a-brave-new-dystopia/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ann Hendon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1984]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Hedges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Orwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://theamericanmercury.org/?p=998</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by Chris Hedges THE TWO GREATEST VISIONS of a future dystopia were George Orwell&#8217;s &#8220;1984&#8221; and Aldous Huxley&#8217;s &#8220;Brave New World.&#8221; The debate, between those who watched our descent towards corporate totalitarianism, was who was right. Would we be, as Orwell wrote, dominated by a repressive surveillance and security state that used crude and violent forms of control? Or would <a class="more-link" href="https://theamericanmercury.org/2011/01/2011-a-brave-new-dystopia/">Continue Reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Chris Hedges</p>
<p>THE TWO GREATEST VISIONS of a future dystopia were George  Orwell&#8217;s &#8220;1984&#8221; and Aldous Huxley&#8217;s &#8220;Brave New World.&#8221; The debate,  between those who watched our descent towards corporate totalitarianism,  was who was right. Would we be, as Orwell wrote, dominated by a  repressive surveillance and security state that used crude and violent  forms of control? Or would we be, as Huxley envisioned, entranced by  entertainment and spectacle, captivated by technology and seduced by  profligate consumption to embrace our own oppression? It turns out  Orwell and Huxley were both right. Huxley saw the first stage of our  enslavement. Orwell saw the second.</p>
<p>We have been gradually disempowered by a corporate state that, as  Huxley foresaw, seduced and manipulated us through sensual  gratification, cheap mass-produced goods, boundless credit, political  theater and amusement. While we were entertained, the regulations that  once kept predatory corporate power in check were dismantled, the laws  that once protected us were rewritten and we were impoverished. Now that  credit is drying up, good jobs for the working class are gone forever  and mass-produced goods are unaffordable, we find ourselves transported  from &#8220;Brave New World&#8221; to &#8220;1984.&#8221; The state, crippled by massive  deficits, endless war and corporate malfeasance, is sliding toward  bankruptcy. It is time for Big Brother to take over from Huxley&#8217;s  feelies, the orgy-porgy and the centrifugal bumble-puppy. We are moving  from a society where we are skillfully manipulated by lies and illusions  to one where we are overtly controlled.</p>
<p>Orwell warned of a world where books were banned. Huxley warned of a  world where no one wanted to read books. Orwell warned of a state of  permanent war and fear. Huxley warned of a culture diverted by mindless  pleasure. Orwell warned of a state where every conversation and thought  was monitored and dissent was brutally punished. Huxley warned of a  state where a population, preoccupied by trivia and gossip, no longer  cared about truth or information. Orwell saw us frightened into  submission. Huxley saw us seduced into submission. But Huxley, we are  discovering, was merely the prelude to Orwell. Huxley understood the  process by which we would be complicit in our own enslavement. Orwell  understood the enslavement. Now that the corporate coup is over, we  stand naked and defenseless. We are beginning to understand, as Karl  Marx knew, that unfettered and unregulated capitalism is a brutal and  revolutionary force that exploits human beings and the natural world  until exhaustion or collapse.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake,&#8221; Orwell wrote in  &#8220;1984.&#8221;  &#8220;We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested  solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness: only  power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently.  We are different from all the oligarchies of the past, in that we know  what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves,  were cowards and hypocrites. The German Nazis and the Russian Communists  came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage  to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even  believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time,  and that just round the corner there lay a paradise where human beings  would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know that no one ever  seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a  means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to  safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish  the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object  of torture is torture. The object of power is power.&#8221;</p>
<p>The political philosopher Sheldon Wolin uses the term &#8220;inverted  totalitarianism&#8221; in his book &#8220;Democracy Incorporated&#8221; to describe our  political system. It is a term that would make sense to Huxley. In  inverted totalitarianism, the sophisticated technologies of corporate  control, intimidation and mass manipulation, which far surpass those  employed by previous totalitarian states, are effectively masked by the  glitter, noise and abundance of a consumer society. Political  participation and civil liberties are gradually surrendered. The  corporation state, hiding behind the smokescreen of the public relations  industry, the entertainment industry and the tawdry materialism of a  consumer society, devours us from the inside out. It owes no allegiance  to us or the nation. It feasts upon our carcass.</p>
<p>The corporate state does not find its expression in a demagogue or  charismatic leader. It is defined by the anonymity and facelessness of  the corporation. Corporations, who hire attractive spokespeople like  Barack Obama, control the uses of science, technology, education and  mass communication. They control the messages in movies and television.  And, as in &#8220;Brave New World,&#8221; they use these tools of communication to  bolster tyranny. Our systems of mass communication, as Wolin writes,  &#8220;block out, eliminate whatever might introduce qualification, ambiguity,  or dialogue, anything that might weaken or complicate the holistic <em>force</em> of their creation, to its <em>total </em>impression.&#8221;</p>
<p>The result is a monochromatic system of information. Celebrity  courtiers, masquerading as journalists, experts and specialists,  identify our problems and patiently explain the parameters. All those  who argue outside the imposed parameters are dismissed as irrelevant  cranks, extremists or members of a radical left. Prescient social  critics, from Ralph Nader to Noam Chomsky, are banished. Acceptable  opinions have a range of A to B. The culture, under the tutelage of  these corporate courtiers, becomes, as Huxley noted, a world of cheerful  conformity, as well as an endless and finally fatal optimism. We busy  ourselves buying products that promise to change our lives, make us more  beautiful, confident or successful as we are steadily stripped of  rights, money and influence. All messages we receive through these  systems of communication, whether on the nightly news or talk shows like  &#8220;Oprah,&#8221; promise a brighter, happier tomorrow. And this, as Wolin  points out, is &#8220;the same ideology that invites corporate executives to  exaggerate profits and conceal losses, but always with a sunny face.&#8221; We  have been entranced, as Wolin writes, by &#8220;continuous technological  advances&#8221; that &#8220;encourage elaborate fantasies of individual prowess,  eternal youthfulness, beauty through surgery, actions measured in  nanoseconds: a dream-laden culture of ever-expanding control and  possibility, whose denizens are prone to fantasies because the vast  majority have imagination but little scientific knowledge.&#8221;</p>
<p>Our manufacturing base has been dismantled. Speculators and swindlers  have looted the U.S. Treasury and stolen billions from small  shareholders who had set aside money for retirement or college. Civil  liberties, including habeas corpus and protection from warrantless  wiretapping, have been taken away. Basic services, including public  education and health care, have been handed over to the corporations to  exploit for profit. The few who raise voices of dissent, who refuse to  engage in the corporate happy talk, are derided by the corporate  establishment as freaks.</p>
<p>Attitudes and temperament have been cleverly engineered by the  corporate state, as with Huxley&#8217;s pliant characters in &#8220;Brave New  World.&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>We increasingly live in Orwell&#8217;s Oceania, not Huxley&#8217;s The World  State. Osama bin Laden plays the role assumed by Emmanuel Goldstein in  &#8220;1984.&#8221; Goldstein, in the novel, is the public face of terror. His evil  machinations and clandestine acts of violence dominate the nightly news.  Goldstein&#8217;s image appears each day on Oceania&#8217;s television screens as  part of the nation&#8217;s &#8220;Two Minutes of Hate&#8221; daily ritual. And without the  intervention of the state, Goldstein, like bin Laden, will kill you.  All excesses are justified in the titanic fight against evil  personified.</p>
<p>The psychological torture of Pvt. Bradley Manning–who has now been  imprisoned for seven months without being convicted of any crime–mirrors  the breaking of the dissident Winston Smith at the end of &#8220;1984.&#8221;  Manning is being held as a &#8220;maximum custody detainee&#8221; in the brig at  Marine Corps Base Quantico, in Virginia. He spends 23 of every 24 hours  alone. He is denied exercise. He cannot have a pillow or sheets for his  bed. Army doctors have been plying him with antidepressants. The cruder  forms of torture of the Gestapo have been replaced with refined  Orwellian techniques, largely developed by government psychologists, to  turn dissidents like Manning into vegetables. We break souls as well as  bodies. It is more effective. Now we can all be taken to Orwell&#8217;s  dreaded Room 101 to become compliant and harmless. These &#8220;special  administrative measures&#8221; are regularly imposed on our dissidents,  including Syed Fahad Hashmi, who was imprisoned under similar conditions  for three years before going to trial. The techniques have  psychologically maimed thousands of detainees in our black sites around  the globe. They are the staple form of control in our maximum security  prisons where the corporate state makes war on our most politically  astute underclass–African-Americans. It all presages the shift from  Huxley to Orwell.</p>
<p>&#8220;Never again will you be capable of ordinary human feeling,&#8221; Winston  Smith&#8217;s torturer tells him in &#8220;1984.&#8221; &#8220;Everything will be dead inside  you. Never again will you be capable of love, or friendship, or joy of  living, or laughter, or curiosity, or courage, or integrity. You will be  hollow. We shall squeeze you empty and then we shall fill you with  ourselves.&#8221;</p>
<p>The noose is tightening. The era of amusement is being replaced by  the era of repression. Tens of millions of citizens have had their  e-mails and phone records turned over to the government. We are the most  monitored and spied-on citizenry in human history. Many of us have our  daily routine caught on dozens of security cameras. Our proclivities and  habits are recorded on the Internet. Our profiles are electronically  generated. Our bodies are patted down at airports and filmed by  scanners. And public service announcements, car inspection stickers, and  public transportation posters constantly urge us to report suspicious  activity. The enemy is everywhere.</p>
<p>Those who do not comply with the dictates of the war on terror, a war  which, as Orwell noted, is endless, are brutally silenced. The  draconian security measures used to cripple protests at the G-20  gatherings in Pittsburgh and Toronto were wildly disproportionate for  the level of street activity. But they sent a clear message–DO NOT TRY  THIS. The FBI&#8217;s targeting of antiwar and Palestinian activists, which in  late September saw agents raid homes in Minneapolis and Chicago, is a  harbinger of what is to come for all who dare defy the state&#8217;s official  Newspeak. The agents–our Thought Police–seized phones, computers,  documents and other personal belongings. Subpoenas to appear before a  grand jury have since been served on 26 people. The subpoenas cite  federal law prohibiting &#8220;providing material support or resources to  designated foreign terrorist organizations.&#8221; Terror, even for those who  have nothing to do with terror, becomes the blunt instrument used by Big  Brother to protect us from ourselves.</p>
<p>&#8220;Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating?&#8221;  Orwell wrote. &#8220;It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias  that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and  torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which  will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/2011_a_brave_new_dystopia_20101227/" class="broken_link">Read the full article at TruthDig</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://theamericanmercury.org/2011/01/2011-a-brave-new-dystopia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
