<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet &#8211; The American Mercury</title>
	<atom:link href="https://theamericanmercury.org/tag/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://theamericanmercury.org</link>
	<description>Founded by H.L. Mencken in 1924</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:13:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Government attacked First Amendment on all fronts in 2010</title>
		<link>https://theamericanmercury.org/2011/01/government-attacked-first-amendment-on-all-fronts-in-2010/</link>
					<comments>https://theamericanmercury.org/2011/01/government-attacked-first-amendment-on-all-fronts-in-2010/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ann Hendon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[US News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Patterson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Minor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://theamericanmercury.org/?p=1070</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[by Jack Minor WHILE THERE have been Government assaults on the First Amendment throughout the history of America, 2010 featured bipartisan attacks on all major forms of media. Congress proposed legislation giving the President what many have said is a &#8220;kill switch&#8221; on the Internet enabling him to shut it down in the event of a &#8220;national cyber emergency.&#8221; A <a class="more-link" href="https://theamericanmercury.org/2011/01/government-attacked-first-amendment-on-all-fronts-in-2010/">Continue Reading &#8594;</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by Jack Minor</p>
<p>WHILE THERE have been Government assaults on the First Amendment  throughout the history of America, 2010 featured bipartisan attacks on  all major forms of media.</p>
<p>Congress proposed legislation giving the President what many  have said is a &#8220;kill switch&#8221; on the Internet enabling him to shut it down  in the event of a &#8220;national cyber emergency.&#8221; A national cyber emergency  is defined in the legislation as an &#8220;actual or imminent action to  exploit a cyber vulnerability.&#8221;  In defending the law, Sen. Joe  Lieberman referenced China&#8217;s right to shut down the Internet as reason  to pass similar legislation in the United States.</p>
<p>&#8220;Cyber war is going on in some sense right now… and we need this  capacity in a time of war&#8221; and &#8220;the President needs to have the ability  to disconnect parts of the Internet.&#8221; Lieberman went on to say that the  President wouldn&#8217;t do this &#8220;every day&#8221; and would only do it in the event  of a &#8220;catastrophic event.&#8221;  Lieberman said Internet users need to &#8220;relax&#8221;  and that &#8220;China can disconnect parts of its Internet in the case of  war; we need to have that here, too.&#8221;</p>
<p>In December FCC Commissioner Michael Copps, during a speech at  Columbia University, called for a &#8220;public values test&#8221; for every  broadcast station as a condition of broadcast license renewal.</p>
<p>The test would include stations committing to news and public affairs  programming with an emphasis on local civic affairs. Copps&#8217; goal is  that at least 25 percent of a station&#8217;s content would reflect local  issues. Copps would like to require that local content reflects &#8220;the  diverse interests and needs of the community.&#8221; He complains that  currently, diversity of programming suffers and minorities &#8220;are ignored.&#8221;  Copps also states he wishes to increase Black ownership of television  stations. Critics have said the regulations would be a back door  approach to reinstituting the Fairness Doctrine&#8230;.</p>
<p>There have even been government<strong> </strong>proposals to  regulate print media.  Republican State Senator Bruce Patterson of  Michigan proposed a plan allowing the government to license journalists  in much the same way as hairdressers, mechanics, and plumbers are  licensed.  Patterson&#8217;s proposal sought to ensure that reporters operate  by ethical standards acceptable to a government-run board.</p>
<p>Earlier this year, the Federal Trade Commission released a report titled  &#8220;The Reinvention of Journalism,&#8221; which stated that more news Web sites did <em>not</em> mean more choice for consumers, and decried what they called a lack of  local news coverage.  The report went on to list several recommendations  to help save the ailing print newspaper industry &#8212; including the  possibility of government subsidies.</p>
<p>Other proposals recommend that once an organization breaks a news  story, that that story be investigated, with other news sites being prohibited  from covering the same story for a set time.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/?p=7283">Read the full article at the <em>Greeley Gazette</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://theamericanmercury.org/2011/01/government-attacked-first-amendment-on-all-fronts-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
